Albrow (1990) as quoted by Rantanen in 2005
theorizes Globalization as the “world (being) incorporated into a single world society,
global society” (Rantanen, T 2005). Social Media can be seen as a testament to
this theory. It allows people via the Internet to communicate to others all
around the world, sharing information & personal details about oneself. All
the while giving you the impression that the use of these sites is free. Although “users do not pay Facebook or
Twitter to use the services” (Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010)
in physical dollars, they are in fact paying with something else. Personal
Information.
It has been acknowledged that the “world
has been dominated by capitalism” (Ritzer, George and Jurgenson,
Nathan 2010) and Social Media sites & the Internet
are successful businesses as they “are fundamentally based on surveillance and
behavior control” (Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010). With the rise of social media, big
businesses have become encompassed “oriented toward finding ways to profit from
this new environment” (Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010). They found a way.
Social media sites such as Facebook compile
the information provided by users, “selling (that) information, often for
advertising purposes” (Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010).
Users of these sites are realized as cash cows for they “can be used to
generate profit in many different ways, primarily advertising” (Ritzer, George
and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010). Often personalized
advertisements can now appear on networking sites as the information provided
by users is marketed against them.
It is a bargain that many users of social
media are yet to recognize, as they provide an online environment with which to
express ourselves “and in return we unwittingly provide them with gold”
(Wilson, S 2012).
So here in lies the social media
predicament. Is the usage of these sites actually free? Or are users being
exploited by way of their personal information being sold to corporations, so
that the corporations can then in turn market individualized advertisements
back at the user? What do you think?
This video shows some of the negative effects social networking, among them, marketing exploitation.
This video shows some of the negative effects social networking, among them, marketing exploitation.
Citations:
Ritzer, George and Jurgenson, Nathan 2010 ‘Production, Consumption,
Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital
‘prosumer’, Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 10 no.
1, pp 13-36.
Rantanen, T. (2005) The Media and
Globalization, Sage, London, pp. 1-18
Wilson, S 2012, Social media exploitation is gravest risk Sydney Morning Herald, The, 03126315, Mar 05, 2012
Awesome read David! I was trying to get a similar point across in my own post and you have structured your excellently. It flowed really well and kept me wanting to continue to read on. You acknowledged prosumerism is capitalist driven especially in Web2.0 technologies. We now have all this access to free services, free being of monetary value though. A lot of people become too excited and don’t realise that what they are giving up in return is their private information. This creates on online profile for you and soon I wouldn’t be surprised if Job Interviews came down to an online identity comparison.
ReplyDeleteThe video was a nice touch, good job.
Your post has been written quite well, with everything flowing and easy to read. The use of quotes from your readings also smooth very nicely into your sentences. First chapter is done well, and gets to the point of what your blog is about. However would of liked to see the word count possess a bit more exemplification. With that aside the YouTube clip was relevant and played well with the content. Good job!
ReplyDelete