Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Hollywood: An American or Global Film Industry?


image citation: http://scripteach.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Richard-Lund-hollywood-sign-at-night.jpg

When we think of Hollywood we conjure images of red carpet, bright lights and celebrities on every corner, well at least I do. The film industry in Hollywood has produced many blockbusters throughout America and it has produced many celebrities that are icons of our attention. But how does Hollywood fit into Globalization? Hollywood can be seen as a representation of the American film industry, which “no longer addresses a national audience” (Wasser, F 1995, p.1) as such the films that Hollywood produce have a global audience. So how does Hollywood appeal to the different audiences around the world?

A significant factor in appealing to a global audience is the choice of actors. For instance, a film that incorporates Asian film stars like Jackie Chan & Jet Li will appeal to an Asian Market. Film stars in this regard can be seen as a commodity for international marketing. The same goes for Australian actors like Hugh Jackman, and his ability to attract an Australian audience.      


Hollywood can also appeal to global markets through the use of particular genres. “Hollywood’s embrace of martial arts …(and) many forms of Asian culture,” (Klein, C 2004 p.2) appeal to a larger international Audience. This can also be done from Asian film studios that seek to gain western audiences. Ponyo, an animated feature from Japan utilizes American celebrities as voice actors in the ‘English’ version of the film. In this regard both countries are cross-pollinating their unique film industries leading to “denationalization of individual films and film industries on both sides of the Pacific” (Klein, C 2004 p.2).   

Hollywood once represented the American film industry, but now Hollywood “no longer privilege a special relationship with the American audience,” (Wasser, F 1995 p.1) and instead offers films that appeal to global audiences.

This raises another question, what will the future of the worlds film industry look like? When considering the ever-amalgamating genres, film stars and cinematography… will all films in the distant future be hybrid representatives of culture?    


Reference: 
Klein, C 2004, ‘Martial arts and the globalization of US and Asian film industries’, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. P

Wasser, F 1995, ‘Is Hollywood America? The Trans-Nation of the American Film Industry’ Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12 (1995), 423-427.

Saturday, 14 September 2013

Celebrity Personas: a global façade.


image citation: http://www.sadmuffin.net/cherrybam/graphics/graphics-celebrity/celebrity009.gif

Celebrities are a cultural phenomenon. In todays modern society many of us idolize them. They are indicative of a lifestyle we all strive for. While most of us don’t actually know a celebrity in person, we know of them “through a collage of mediated texts like films, concert performances, or video clips… celebrity documentaries and gossip magazines” (Duits, L, & Van Romondt Vis, P 2007, P.4) and exposure to other global media forms.

But how much of these celebrities are we actually seeing? Celebrities are “the product of media representation” (Duits, L, & Van Romondt Vis, P 2007, P.4) and should be considered to have dual identities. There is the actual person behind the celebrity and there is the persona of the celebrity. “A persona is the distinctive image of a person built up from their mediated appearances” (Evans, 2005: 19) and because of this, how much can we really know about the person behind the persona?

Let’s say you have clicked ‘like’ on a celebrity’s social media site. You now believe you have a greater glimpse into this celebrities life, however this is not the case. What we see and share on these sites is not a true representation of the celebrity. In between what we see of these personalities, there is a makeup artist, a camera, a photographer, and an editor. In this context it can be said that celebrities pose and present a metaphorical mask of the self for public intake. The more we pull away the layers of these ‘so called’ identities, the more we can see how new/social media can create a public representation that is completely false from its actuality.



But it doesn’t stop there. Are we not all guilty of this form of representation? Personally when I upload an image on social media, I ensure it portrays my worthy features. When we leave our houses, do we not take a look in the mirror to disguise our true identities from societal judgment? What do you think? Do you have a façade?  


Citations:
Duits, L, & Van Romondt Vis, P 2007, 'Girls Make Sense: Girls, Celebrities, and Identities', Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, pp. 1-23, Communication & Mass Media Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 14 September 2013.


Evans, J. (2005) ‘Celebrity, media and history’ in J. Evans and D. Hesmondhalgh (eds)
Understanding media: Inside celebrity, pp. 12-55. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Thursday, 5 September 2013

Globalization & the Damsel in Distress (as portrayed in videogame culture).


image url: http://www.companiesandmarkets.com/Content/DynamicMedia/cms-uploaded/Video%20Games.gif

Globalization is a broad term, simplified it can be understood as “theorizing about global interconnectedness” (Eriksen, T 2007). So where do video games become involved? A computer game is a “form of participatory media culture” (Raessens, J) in which the use of multimediality, virtuality and interactivity join together. Multimediality is the amalgamation of images both moving and stationary, sound features and written scripts. Virtuality is the computer-generated world in which the gamer becomes encompassed. Finally, Interactivity refers to the gamer’s ability to navigate the games story and its ending.

Video Games can be comprehensively associated to Globalization. This can be witnessed through console distribution, for example the Sony PlayStation originated in Japan and is now disseminated around the world (the very same for Nintendo consoles). Online gaming can also be linked with Globalization theories as it connects people from different parts of the world into the single realm. Gaming has saturated the globe and with it storyline tropes that offer damaging representation of woman characters and their identities.

The damsel in distress trope has been reproduced throughout history as “developers have consistently chosen to place female characters such as Princess Peach and Zelda into passive, almost always unplayable roles” (Carpenter, N 2013). The damsel in distress trope refers typically to a female character in a perilous situation that must be rescued by the male protagonist. In the gaming realm this can be seen as disempowering woman as they are represented as trophy presented at the completion of the game. Because of this, it can be argued that developers “demonstrate how they continue to perpetuate negative gender stereotypes” (Carpenter, N 2013).


However, in opposition to this representation there are two video games that immediately spring to mind; Tomb Raider & Mass Effect. Both games offer female protagonists that break free from the typical gender roles of society. Lara Croft from Tomb Raider (despite having over developed female features) can be seen as an empowering representation of woman. Jane Shepard of Mass Effect is the embodiment of masculinity as she fights to save the galaxy. What do you think, has gaming perpetuated negative gender stereotypes?        

Carpenter, N 2013, 'Tropes vs. Women in Video Games [Online Video Series]. Part I: Damsel in Distress (2013)', Women & Language, 36, 1, pp. 97-99, Humanities Source, EBSCOhost, viewed 5 September 2013.

Eriksen, T 2007, Globalization: The Key Concepts, Oxford: Berg, eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost, viewed 5 September 2013.

Raessens, J “Computer Games As participatory media Culture”, retrieved Thursday 5th September 2013. URL: <http://www.hum.uu.nl/medewerkers/j.raessens/Publicaties/raessens_c24.pdf>

Sunday, 1 September 2013

Blogosphere, Public Sphere & Politics.


Image Source: http://resources2.news.com.au/images/2010/02/05/1225827/280954-kevin-rudd.jpg

At this very moment, while you are reading this, you are avidly participating in globalization. The content that you are now scanning with your eyes, curiously wondering as to where I’m going with this topic, is a blog. A Blog is an online document filled with opinions, ideas, information and it is quickly becoming one of the most prominent forms of online communication. The collection of all the Blogs metaphorically drifting in space is known as the Blogosphere, and it “constructs space for public forum such that anyone can participate” (Lee, J 2006). This concept is suggested to work within Jürgen Habermas’s idea of a public sphere, in which a forum exists that allows the expression of public opinion and is available to all (Habermas, J 1989). But is the blogosphere this ideological public sphere?     

The interesting thing about Blogs is that frequently the subjects or topics are focused on world events, with numerous Australian Blogs containing a “strong focus on politics” (Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Highfield, T., and Nicolai, T. 2011). This is more relevant then ever, as we approach the Australian Election for 2013: Rudd vs. Abbott. 

As identified by Jae Lee in his analysis, “blogosphere’s attention and focus” (2006) switch to political events at times of elections similar to the news media coverage throughout the current election campaign. The public sphere in this instance is a “universally accessible space where informed citizens engage in the political process through rational- critical debate” (lee, J 2006), but just how informed are these citizens and what classifies as rational?

Personally, I do not care for either the Liberal or Labour party. Tony Abbott on the topic on the rights of woman has been quoted “I think it would be folly to expect that women will ever dominate or even approach equal representation”. Does this sound rational? Whilst Kevin Rudd was quoted “we have a prime minister, I'm the foreign minister, I'm trying to get on with the job of doing Australia's foreign policy,” informing the public of his dishonesty, as he eventually took over Julia Gillard’s role of Prime Minister.


On the topic of politics, it raises the question as to whether or not the blogosphere could possibly be the miraculous public sphere defined by Habermas. The idea of the public sphere is that informed people can discuss rationally, but blogs are accessible to everyone, and like Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott, not everyone is rational and or well informed. Do you think the Blogosphere could be the Public Sphere?



Citations: 

Lee, J 2006, 'The Blogosphere and the Public Sphere: Exploring Possibility of the Blogosphere as a Public Sphere', Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, pp. 1-23, Communication & Mass Media Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 September 2013.   

Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Highfield, T., and Nicolai, T. 2011 ‘Mapping the Australian Networked Public Sphere’, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 277-287.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois
society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.